Search results

Doesn't go in the hood obviously, mount it in your frame. As for the size of the compressor, yeah, much smaller than what a train would use to run it, then again you aren't going to be needing a sustained or repeated bursts. You can get one that sounds like it, or you can can get the real thing...

Train Horn - Horn from a train. You need a compressor to run one, and for the most part cops will have just another reason to hate you. Pricey, but worth every penny.

How do you figure there is a better ride? Yes they are more 'effective' in the meaning that you can get more lift, not that they keep ride quality. I could understand doing it to retain the ability to crank them as the front end sags. I can't see keeping stock quality unless there were drop...

Well that will be my plan as well. I guess I just don't understand how there is the claim of retaining the stock ride quality when I know for a fact that cranking them stiffens it.....

Watching some of the science channels I saw that they can make it out of just about any plant bio-mass. Crops/weeds that we have no use for and will grow anywhere. Now if only it'd happen. Still rather have a diesel Tahoe, almost bought one but then settled on my Ranger years ago. Wish I could...

My understanding is that the only reason you're adding the gas is to make it unfit for human consumption. E85 is nice, but in the end they need a better source, plenty of other things they can use to produce it rather than food stuffs.

I'm not worried about cranking my torsion bars for 1.5" or so, that was one of the first things I did to my Ranger 7 years ago when I got her. What I want to know is about using the F150 keys on my Tahoe. Is it a 2" difference at the same crank level or are they just going to enable me to gain...